cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday  March 12  1934

Premium

20.500.12592/193h16

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday March 12 1934

1934

Roy has acted as a Judge of the High Court he has given entire satifaction to the legal profession and the general public and by his reversion to the Bar they will be deprived of the services of an able and efficient Judge. [...] From his dogmatic assertion of the law and from the fact that it followed in the footsteps of the news-paper propganda in England that such mixed marriages should be discouraged it seemed to us that Mr. [...] But as lawyers and journalists we do not allow our personal prejudices or predilections to stand in the way of correct exposition of the law and prejudice the rights liberties and obligtions of the parties concerned. [...] Sir Bhashyam’s answer was in the following 69lxx VIE OXTICIIITT1 MERU NOTES [Vou4XXVIII terms:-- If a question should arise in a British Indian Court as a question of foreign law of the place where the ceremony puporting-.to be a ceremony of marriage was gone through (a question which could have to be proved in the Indian Court as a queton of fact) the Indian Court would hold the intende [...] Although the Act required them to declare that they did not belong to the Hindu religious faith the Brahmos generally assert now-a-days that all the same they belong to the Hindu community and claim to be governed by the Hindu law.
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday March 12 1934
lxix-lxxii unknown view

Related Topics

All