The Indian Law Reports Bombay Series Containing Cases Determined by the High Court at Bombay and by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from that Court 1877

Grindiban Minder Roy v. Tirichand Bundepadhya . Guddalur v. Kunnattur . Guduri v. Rapaka . Gulf/Wits Jagjivandis v. Lalitaram Atmaram Gundo v. Mardan , Guravi v. Guravi . Gwillim v. Gwillim . Page 294 . 338 . 201 - 205 579, 680 . 288 548,550 Gyan Chan v. Jawahur . : 131 H Hadjee Ismkil klubbeeb v Hadjee Mahomed Hadjee Jonsub . 42 Hall v. Green . is Hano [...] v. Langlois . 498 Restal v. London and South-Western Railway Company 291 Rhodes v. Forwood . 469 Richmond v. New London Railway Company . 185 Ruver Bhudr Sheo Bhudr v. Boopshunker Shunkerjee 187 Roy Meghraj v. Beejoy Gobind . 545 Ruckmabai v. Lulloobhoy IVIotichund . 256 Russell v. Russell . 240 Buttonji Edulji v. Collector of Thana. [...] . 523, 528 S Salu v. Ravji . 94 . Samarchand v. Haji Ismail . 1 Sanderson v. Symonds . 323 Sashochellum Chetty a. Govindappa 46 Savalgiapa v Basvanapa . 599 Sayad Abdt11 v. Sayad Hasham . 635, 637 Scott v. Nixon . 1 . 294 Secretary of State v. Kamachee Boye Saheba . 383 Secretary of State v. Bombay Landing and Shipping Company . 9 Shalioadee Hamra Begum v. [...] W Page Wells v. Abrahams . 147 West India and Pacific Steam Ship Company . 825 Whitbread, ex parte . 240 Whitefield v. The South-Eastern Railway Company 185 Whittle v. Frankland . 470 Woodoy Chand v. Nitye Mandal . 199 Worley v. Worley . 276 Y Yelland's Case . 469 Yestiji Aptiji v. Yestiji Mhaloji . 685 THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS. [...] The decree of the court of first instance directed the Commissioner to take an account of the moneys paid by the plaintiff, during the period between 24th January 1865 and tho date of the filing of the plaint, for the use and at the request of the defendants, and to allow credit to the defendants for the sums for which the plaintiff had liven credit in his particulars of demand, and for all other