cover image: The Indian Decisions (New Series)  Being a re-print of all the decisions of the Privy Council on appeals from India and of the various High Courts and other Superior Courts in India reported both in the official and non-official reports from 1875  Allahabad (1885)  I.L.R. 7  Allahabad

Premium

20.500.12592/bwhppw

The Indian Decisions (New Series) Being a re-print of all the decisions of the Privy Council on appeals from India and of the various High Courts and other Superior Courts in India reported both in the official and non-official reports from 1875 Allahabad (1885) I.L.R. 7 Allahabad

1922

Harjas v. Kanhya, 7 A 118=4 A W N (1884) 271 80 Harpal Singh v. Bal Gobind, 7 A 586 (F B)=5 A W N (1885) 134 405 Harprasad v. Jafar Ali, 7 A 345=5 A W N (1885) 73 238 Hire v. Kallu, 7 A 916=5 A W N (1885) 295=10 Ind Jur 150 636 Hire Dai v. Hiza Lal, 7 A 508=5 A W N (1885) 144 371 Hub Lal v. Kanhia Lal, 7 A 365=5 AWN (1885) 52 252 I Imdad Ali Khan v. The Colleotor of Farakhabad, 7 A 817 =5 A [...] The v. Angan, 7 A 112=4 A W N (1884) 275 76 Man Kuar v. Tara Singb, 7 A 583=5 A W N (1885) 124 402 Masuma Bibi v. The Collector of Ballia on behalf of the Court of:Wards, 7 A 687=5 A W N (1885) 227 475 Mashar All v. Budh Singb, 7 A 297 IF B) =4 A W N (1884) 333 204 Muhammad Await; v. Har Sahai, 7 A 716=5 A W N (1885). 172 495 Muhammad Habibullab Khan v. Safdar Husain Khan, 7 A 25=4 A W N (188 [...] A suit brought by him against the manager of the Court of Wards during the minority of the late Raja, for the recovery of arrears, [3] and to enforce payment of maintenance, was dismissed by the High Court in June, 1868, on the ground that the annuity had been in effect attached, by the direction of Government, on account of Rup Singh’s having joined the rebels. [...] The appellant who was the plaintiff, sued for possession of the estate called Raj Bhara, comprising the villages and other moveable and immoveable properties specified in the schedules annexed to the plaint, by right of succession to the deceased Raja Mahander Singh, according, as stated in the plaint, `to the custom prevalent in other estates and the usage of the family of the Raja of Bhara. [...] The plaintiff in his plaint stated that- " The ancient usage of the Raj of Bhara, in common with the other families of the Rajas, is that, after the decease of a Baja, his [9] nearest and eldest male heir succeeds him, to the exclusion of the other male heirs and the total exclusion of women.
law
Pages
741
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100023
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-xvii The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view
I. L. R. 7 Allahabad
1-638 The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view
General Index
639-724 The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view

Related Topics

All